“Yowwww!?!!!”
I was walking in
the Michigan woods last fall and, out of the blue (literally), something hit me
in the head, hard! Looking to where I had heard whatever it was hit the ground
and had seen in my peripheral vision something roll to a stop, I found a large,
fresh acorn. Maybe a squirrel had just clipped it and let it drop (or aimed it --
I have had that happen to me before with pinecones!). But the oak above was
large enough to impede my ability to spot any guilty party nearby. The knock really
smarted, though, and I rubbed my head while wondering if it drew blood. The tip
had a sharp point, and the nut may have hit me from that position.
Thinking of Isaac
Newton under the proverbial apple tree, and the alleged falling orb by which he
brilliantly began to deduce the force of gravity, I wondered if there was
anything brilliant I was supposed to construe from this occurrence -- besides perhaps
wearing a hat when I walk under oak trees in the fall, or avoiding proximity to
coconut trees altogether. So it set me to thinking. Why, indeed, do some trees
produce large seeds like this, and others produce tiny, wispy ones that float
on the breeze? And what is their essential difference? I decided to do a little
research, and here is what I found.
In general, trees
produce one of two kinds of seed: one has enough substance to give the potential
plant some resources with which it can get its start in life, so to speak, and
the other kind does not. Rather, the latter’s seed is released to find its own
resources if it can. Interestingly, the tree that produces the first kind
expends so much energy preparing a seed with its own resources that it doesn’t
produce many seeds; conversely, the tree that produces the second kind,
expending so much less energy preparing its seed, can release them by the
millions. As Bernd Heinrich says in his book The Trees in My Forest, “A
tree has only so much to give… It can either have millions of seeds, each with
a tiny inheritance… or relatively few seeds, each endowed with a large
inheritance.”
Cases in point:
my assaulting oak compared with the ubiquitous aspen. The oak produces a
limited number of acorns, dropping them in the fall with, of course, the assistance
of squirrels. All nut trees, oaks included (and coconuts!), are of the first
kind mentioned above: the entire seed contains enough resources to get it
started even on a less-than-perfect patch of ground, even in the shade. By
contrast, an aspen releases millions of cottony tufts to the wind, each
carrying a seed so small it can hardly be seen. One can brush against my face when
it flies in May and I likely may not even feel it, yet the ground might be
covered in the down. Each aspen tuft and seed drifts randomly in the rare hope
of landing on some hospitable piece of real estate, the one with the most
suitable depth and health of soil, the most advantageous amount of sunshine and
most suitable quantity of moisture to thrive. Infinitesimally few are so lucky,
for, on
average, perhaps only one of the seeds a mature aspen releases in its
lifetime will grow to fully replace it. (Think averages. If this were not true,
northern climes would be covered with nothing but aspens.) Luckily, aspens have
another thing going for them by which they are far more successful in their
reproductive efforts: most aspens grow from shoots sent underground by a parent
plant, and are thus clones of the original. It’s what allows aspens to be the
first up after a blowdown, fire or clearcut, without having to wait for a
parent tree to release its seed.
 |
| Aspen seeds |
But I also found
some other interesting things. For example, I wondered how oaks reproduce
successfully if animals eat all their acorns. After all, they are a favorite of
bear, deer, jays, squirrels and others. I knew, of course, that one of the ways
is that squirrels forget (or don’t quite get back to) all the places they’ve
buried their stores, and those left behind often sprout, with gratitude for the
convenient planting. But in addition to this, I found that nut bearing trees
don’t produce every year, and after producing very well can go for several seasons
with no crop; this gives them a better chance of eventually sneaking in some
seeds that don’t get eaten, while the animal, who has been used to feasting
there each season, turns up empty a year or two and writes the tree off his
to-do list. I thought that was pretty wonderful.
Of course,
thinking about these things leads me naturally to think of Jesus’ parables of
the good soil (Luke 8:4-18) or the
mustard seed (Matthew 13:31-32).
Each of these texts would offer me much to consider if I spun them awhile through
my cranium. But the concept most clear and dear to me from this musing is a
takeoff on his little parable of the dying kernel in John 12:24, “…Unless a grain
of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains by itself alone. But if it
dies, it bears much fruit…” We humans die as a seed, but of the first kind,
like the acorn – with all the resources having been made available while we
lived that would be necessary for us to sprout and live fruitfully again, even
forever. The only difference is that we need to have realized and taken
advantage of it.
Hmmm, all from a
knock on the head…
~~RGM, May 12, 2016
